ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE: THE APPLICATION OF THE DOCTRINE OF VICARIOUS LIABILTY

Authors

  • Adekunle Saheed Abiola Department of Private and Business Law, Fountain University, osogbo
  • Zaynab Omotoyosi Shittu-Adenuga Department of Private and Business Law, Fountain University, Osogbo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53704/fulaj.v1i1.514

Abstract

The rapid advancement and integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies in various disciplines have brought significant changes to the world, including Nigeria. However, the expansion of AI systems raises critical concerns regarding the potential negligence and responsibility for any harm caused by these intelligent machines and the Nigerian Legal System has not addressed AI-related negligence and vicarious liability. It is against this backdrop that this work examined the negligence of artificial intelligence and the application of the doctrine of vicarious liability in Nigeria. The work revealed that the application of AI technology is expanding across sectors such as healthcare, transportation, finance, law and medical professions. Negligence in the context of AI can arise from several factors, including design flaws, programming errors, inadequate training data, biased algorithms, or insufficient testing and the doctrine of vicarious liability becomes crucial in determining who should bear responsibility for AI-related harm. The work concluded that due to the dearth of a legal framework for AI in Nigeria, most of these breaches have remained unresolved. To address this, this work made a number of recommendations which include the need for a legal framework to address the liability of AI, There is need for Standards and Guidelines: Industry-specific standards and guidelines should be developed for AI systems to ensure their safe and responsible deployment, need for training and awareness for medical practitioners, legal practitioners, judges, policymakers, and other stakeholders to enhance their understanding of AI technologies and their implications for negligence and vicarious liability, among others

Keywords: Artificial Intelligence, Vicarious Liability, Negligence, Doctrine and Legal framework

References

R. George Cross and G. Cary Debessonet, ‘An Artificial Intelligence Application in the Law:

CCLIPS, A Computer Program that Processes Legal Information’ High Tech. L. J. (1986) 329

N Udin, ‘The Potential and Impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Our Lives and Work’ (2023)<https://www.researchgate.net/publication/367328118_The_Potential_and_Impact_of_Artificial_Intelligence_AI_in_Our_Lives_and_Work> accessed 17 January 2024

Garner B A, Black’s Law Dictionary (9th edn West Publishers, United States, 2007)

What is artificial intelligence. <https://www.ibm.com/topics/artificial-intelligence> accessed 7 January 2024

John McCarthy, WHAT IS ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE? Computer Science Department, Stanford University Stanford, http://www-formal.stanford.edu/jmc/2007 accessed 7 January 2024

<https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11023-022-09612-y> accessed 7 January 2024

What is vicarious liability? <https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/vicarious-liability-in-tort/what-is-vicarious-liability/0A9745E929A46D577EB8A36CE61DF006>

Launchdury v Morgans (1973) AC.122 at 135, per Lord Denning

Sharon Paint & Chemical Co. Ltd v Ezenwa (2001) FWLR (pt.43) 290 at 312 and Nduka v Ezenwaku (2006) 6 NWLR (pt.809) 494

See Sharon Paint & Chemical Co. Ltd v Ezenwa (supra) at 312

B Soyer ‘Artificial intelligence and civil liability—do we need a new regime?’ (2022) 30(4) International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 385–397

Ibid, 397

See Duncan Fairgrieve and Richard S Goldberg, Product Liability (3rd edn, OUP 2020), 13-38.

J Uba ‘Nigeria: Artificial Intelligence (AI) Goes Wrong: Real-Life Cases And Regulatory Implications Of The Negative Effects of Artificial Intelligence (AI) In Nigeria’ <https://www.mondaq.com/nigeria/newtechnology/1309544/artificial-intelligence-ai-goes-wrong-real-life-cases-and-regulatory-implications-of-the-negative-effects-of-artificial-intelligence-ai-in-nigeria> accessed 7 January 2023

See Section 37, Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 as amended.

C Unini ‘Humiliated NY Lawyer Who Used ChatGpt For Bogus Court Doc Profusely Apologizes’ <https://thenigerialawyer.com/humiliated-ny-lawyer-who-used-chatgpt-for-bogus-court-doc-profusely-apologizes> accessed 11 January 2024

‘Personal injury versus property damage claims’ <https://www.klampelawfirm.com/blog/2022/11/personal-injury-versus-property-damage-claims/#:~:text=Personal%20injury%20and%20property%20damage%20claims%20are%20dealt,while%20virtually%20every%20collision%20results%20in%20property%20damage.> accessed 10 January 2024

A Tettenborn, ‘Property Damage and Economic Loss: Should Claims by Property Owners Themselves Be Limited’ (2005) 34 CLWR 128.

J D Gary ‘Direct Foreign Investment and Contractual Relations in the People's Republic of China’ (1994) 6 DePaul Business Law Journal DePaul Bus. L.J. 331.

J Dewey ‘The Historic Background of Corporate Legal Personality’ (1926) 35(6) Yale Law Journal 655.

P Gilika, ‘Vicarious Liability in Tort A Comparative Perspective’(2010) <https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/vicarious-liability-in-tort/what-is-vicarious-liability/0A9745E929A46D577EB8A36CE61DF006> accessed 6th January 2024

Steamco ltd v. Mark & Ors (2018) LPELR-45947(CA)

See the case of Obi vs. Biwater Shellabear (Nig) Ltd (1997) 1 NWLR (Pt. 484) 722

Coleman et all, Theories of the Common Law of Torts, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring, 2022); Edward Zalta (ed.) <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2022/entries/tort-theories/> accessed 11 January 2024

B Soyer and B Tetternborn, ‘Artificial intelligence and civil liability: Do we need a new regime?’ (2022) 30(4) International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 385–397 <https://doi.org/10.1093/ijlit/eaad001> accessed 6th January 2024

Santhakumar Raja ‘Independence and Joint Tortfeasors’ <https://theteche.com/joint-tortfeasors-law-of-torts-independent-tortfeasors/#:~:text=The%20liability%20of%20joint%20tortfeasors%20is%20joint%20and,and%20the%20agent%20are%20jo8intly%20and%20severally%20liable> accessed 10 January 2024

Chukwu v Soleh Boneh Ltd pt.27) 2046 at 2065, Per Ogundare, JSC

B Soyer and B Tetternborn ‘Artificial intelligence and civil liability: Do we need a new regime?’ (2022) 30(4) International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 385–397 <https://doi.org/10.1093/ijlit/eaad001> accessed 6 January 2024

<https://brainly.in/question/29544896#:~:text=Artificial%20intelligence%20A%20task%20that%20a%20humans%20or,a%20specific%20goal%20is%20known%20as%20artificial%20intelligence.> accessed 10 January 2024

Ese Malemi, Law of Tort (Princeton Publishing Co, Lagos, 2013)

<https://sciencenigeria.com/fg-finalises-policy-on-ai-commends-volunteers-for-contributions/> accessed 10 January 2024

Section 167 of the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Act, 2018

Chapter L82 of the Laws of Lagos State 2015.

Downloads

Published

2024-04-07