Equitable Distribution and Gender Justice:Analyzing Women's share in Marital Property Regimes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53704/mpjpe445Keywords:
Feminists Theory, , Equity, , Domestic Labour,Abstract
This article critically examines the principle of equitable distribution in marital asset division, with a particular focus on the recognition and valuation of women’s contributions, both financial and non-financial, within marriage. It interrogates the extent to which legal systems acknowledge the multifaceted roles women play in sustaining marital partnerships, including income generation, domestic labor, caregiving, and emotional support. Drawing on feminist legal theory and intersectional analysis, the study explores how statutory frameworks, judicial discretion, and cultural norms across jurisdictions, including Nigeria, South Africa, the United Kingdom, and the United States, shape the outcomes of asset division upon divorce. It highlights the systemic undervaluation of domestic labour, caregiving, and emotional support, and identifies key barriers to equitable distribution, such as legal ambiguity, patriarchal traditions, financial illiteracy, and asset concealment. In many cases, these plural legal systems reinforce gender hierarchies and fail to provide adequate remedies for women whose contributions are not easily quantifiable in monetary terms. The analysis underscores the need for a more inclusive and context-sensitive approach to marital property division, one that accounts for the lived realities of spouses and the socio-economic dynamics that shape marital relationships. Through an extensive review of case law and empirical data, the article reveals that existing legal regimes often fail to deliver substantive equality for women, particularly in contexts where customary and religious laws dominate. The article argues for a transformative approach to marital property reform, advocating for statutory clarity, judicial training, expanded legal aid, public education, and institutional safeguards against financial manipulation. By integrating legal analysis with socio-economic inquiry, the article contributes to the discourse on gender justice in family law and calls for reforms that recognize and reward all forms of marital contribution. The pursuit of equitable distribution, it concludes, must be grounded in both legal principle and lived reality to ensure fairness, dignity, and equality for all spouses.
References
Bibliography
Books
Catharine MacKinnon, Toward a Feminist Theory of the State (Harvard University Press 1989)
Martha Fineman, The Autonomy Myth: A Theory of Dependency (New Press 2004)
Sandra Fredman, Discrimination Law (2nd edn, OUP 2011)
T.O. Elias, The Nigerian Legal System (Routledge 1963)
Glendon, The Transformation of Family Law (University of Chicago Press 1989)
Atkinson, Modern Family Law (5th edn, West Academic 2014)
Anne Barlow, ‘Property and Couple Relationships: What Does Community of Property Have to Offer English Law?’ in Changing Contours of Domestic Life (Hart Publishing 2009)
Chianu. Emeka, Money, Marriage and the Law (Benin City: Mindex Publishing Co. Ltd 2025).
Journal Articles
Ewelukwa, ‘Postcolonialism, Gender, Customary Injustice: Widows in African Societies’ (2002) 24 Human Rights Quarterly.
Rosemary Hunter, ‘An Account of Feminist Judging’ (2012) 20 Feminist Legal Studies.
Stark, ‘Marriage Proposals: From One-Size-Fits-All to Postmodern Marriage Law’ (2007) 89 California Law Review.
Joni Hersch and Jennifer B. Shinall, ‘When Equitable Is Not Equal’ (2020) 11(2) Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 328
Antony Dnes, ‘The Division of Marital Assets Following Divorce’ (1998) 25(3) Journal of Law and Society 336
O.M. Adekile, ‘Towards the Development of a Marital Property Regime for Nigeria’ (2019) 4(2) Unilag Journal of Humanities 97
Attah, ‘Divorcing Marriage from Marital Assets: Why Equity and Women Fail in Property Readjustment Actions in Nigeria’ (2018) 62(3) Journal of African Law 427.
E Bonthuys, ‘Gender and the South African Legal System’ (2008) 24 South African Journal on Human Rights 39.
Nkiruka Okaphor and others, ‘Women’s Inheritance Rights in Nigeria: An Analysis of the Legal Gaps and Reform Prospects’ (2024) 11 (4) Journal of Contemporary Private Law.
Kunle Edun, ‘Right Of Married Women To Share In The Family’s Property’ The Nigeria Lawyer (22 December 2021) https://thenigerialawyer.com/right-of-married-women-to-share-in-the-familys-property/.
J Claassen, ‘Protection of Women’s Marital Property Rights upon the Dissolution of a Customary Marriage in South Africa’ (UCT, 2023)
Cases
Ukeje v Ukeje (2014) LPELR-22724(SC)
Aguolu v Aguolu (2025) LPELR-80269 (CA)
White v White (2000) UKHL 54, (2001) 1 AC 596
Standish v Standish (2025) UKSC 26
M.L.M v T.M.M (2024) ZAGPPHC 743
EB v ER and KG v Minister of Home Affairs (2023) ZACC 32
O'Brien v O'Brien 66 N.Y.2d 576 (1985)
Oghoyone v Oghoyone (2010) 3 NWLR Pt 1182 564, 584
Ogunnubi v Ogunnubi (2021) LPELR – 53497 (CA)
Okere v Akaluka (2014) LPELR – 24287 (CA) 1, 60-61
MW V AN MC No 20 of 2016 (2021) eKLR
Mueller v Mueller (2005) LPELR 12687 CA 1, 16
Torkin v Susac (2025) NY App Div
Trethewey v Trethewey (2024) Mass App Ct
Legislations
Matrimonial Causes Act Cap M7 LFN 2004 (Nigeria)
Matrimonial Property Act 88 of 1984 (South Africa)
Recognition of Customary Marriages Act 120 of 1998 (South Africa)
Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 (UK)
Matrimonial Property Act of 2013 (Kenyan)
Namibian Married Persons Equality Act of 1996
Reports and Other Sources
UN Women, Progress of the World’s Women 2019–2020: Families in a Changing World (UN Publications 2020)
Legal Aid Council of Nigeria, Annual Report 2023
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Grace Abraham Ahiakwo

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.